First, watch the trailer for The Company Men:
Looks good, right? In fact, this is one of the most promising trailers I have seen in a while – although keep in mind I just saw the Transformers 3 trailer… just awful. (I hope NASA is as pissed off as I am.) But yes, it looks like there are all the elements of a good story here along with a promising cast, including Ben Affleck as the guy who lost his job, Tommy Lee Jones and as Chris Cooper his former coworkers, Craig T. Nelson as their boss, and Kevin Costner as Affleck’s brother in law, who is sporting a Boston accent – guess he heard I was ripping on him for not doing a British accent in Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves.
The problem with this movie is… well, it’s just not very good. If somebody pitched the idea of doing a movie about downsizing on a corporate level, it sounds like the stuff Oscars are made of, right? The problem here is I don’t believe this movie for a second. The characters are one dimensional and largely unsympathetic. I’m sorry, I love Tommy Lee Jones as much as anybody, but it’s pretty hard to believe that Maria Bello would have an affair with him – and what’s with the totally random shot of her rack? I love rack as much as anybody, but there was no need to include a shot of her rack while she was getting dressed. It felt like they were there shooting the movie and a producer called the director’s cell and said, “Hey, do me a favor: get some tits into this movie any way you can. Nothing says authentic drama like tits.” Its that kind of movie; you find yourself wondering, what the hell is happening here? Isn’t a million dollar home excessive for an executive that makes under $150k a year? I don’t understand the way Affleck’s character was written – it’s like they were thinking about doing the five stages of grief with him after he lost his job, but in the end, they decided, “Fuck it, lets just do denial, a little anger, and a dash of acceptance.” Why is Cooper’s character the flattest, least interesting character ever? His suicide isn’t a surprise; you’re waiting for it. In the first five minutes of the movie, his character promises to “take an AK47 to the place” if they fire him… The guy is literally throwing rocks at the office building after he gets fired… it’s the most inauthentic thing you’ll ever see on film. When Affleck gets a job working with Costner as a carpenter, you expect it to go somewhere, for Affleck to learn something besides his brother in law isn’t so bad after all. Or, maybe he’ll get good at carpentry. Or maybe that his Porsche and his country club membership weren’t so important after all. But no, that doesn’t happen. Meanwhile, Tommy Lee Jones leaves his wife after he gets fired… presumably because she bought a really expensive end table (like over $10k) in a previous scene… or because he’s having an affair… I don’t know. There just isn’t enough content in the movie to explain it. Then he decides to start his own company and he hires Affleck and they are pretty much back where they started before they got fired and the movie ends. There is no rivalry with the old company – I was thinking it might have been interesting to do a “you were doing business the wrong way, we’re doing it the right way and we’ll be more successful than you,” sort of angle, but it can’t because the movie is over. (And not a moment too soon, it’s a long 104 minutes.) The movie just always leaves you feeling… I don’t know, flat. You never feel what the movie intends for you to feel – when Cooper’s character dies, you don’t fee bad – he was a miserable man, you’re sort of glad he’s dead so you don’t have to listen to him complain anymore.
OK, I’m going to leave it there. The movie isn’t unwatchable, but on a whole, it just doesn’t work. The characters are crappy and the plot is kind of pointless. It’s an ensemble drama that wants to do character portraits, but it doesn’t devote hardly enough time to any of the characters, not even Affleck, who is the star of the damn movie. Nobody really learns anything, nobody changes… There are some good performances in here (sorry, Chris Cooper – I know they wrote you into a corner, but your sad-sack whining just wasn’t working here), but it’s not enough to save the movie. I am neither recommending nor endorsing this movie – its crappy, but if there are no other movies to see, it’s watchable. It’s like the Coors Light of movies.
My Rating: 3 out of 5
Ridley Scott‘s version of Robin Hood (starring Russell Crowe in the title role) was released yesterday (September 20, 2010) on Blu Ray Disc and DVD. Why is Ray Blue, you ask? Ray probably didn’t like Robin Hood, like over half of the people who saw it. (that’s an awful pun, I’m ashamed of myself.)
I won’t bother you with a summary of Robin Hood. Suffice to say that this Robin Hood movie’s approach is to tell you a story that seems to link the traditional Robin Hood characters together through coincidence. This movie functions primarily as an origin movie in a much more concise way than Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves, which moved through the origin and established the character as the outlaw of Sherwood Forest within the first act, while this version of Robin Hood doesn’t state this until the very end of the film – oh, and it was a HUGE MISTAKE to put that moment in the trailer; in the movie itself, it’s actually a well realized scene that works, but in the trailer, it just seems pretentious.
Characters you may be expecting to play a central roll, such as Mark Addy as Friar Tuck, Matthew Macfadyen as the Sheriff of Nottingham, Kevin Durand as Little John or Scott Grimes as Will Scarlet – sorry, these characters are in the movie, but barely. I think the most disappointing notion this version of Robin Hood asks you to swallow is that the Sheriff of Nottingham is a peripheral foul. Cate Blanchett as Lady Marian, however, is up front and center, and she turns in a great performance like always.
The takeaway is that Robin Hood is a decent enough movie, but it doesn’t necessarily need to be a Robin Hood movie. The movie flows well, the acting, sets and locations are amazing and the story is believable enough. It’s grittier than most Robin Hood movies (unless you consider the rape humor in Prince of Thieves gritty like i do – see various gags here), and I’ve even seen it labeled as depressing in reviews. The thing is, it’s a war movie; Ridley Scott’s Robin Hood has almost as much in common with Saving Private Ryan as it does with Prince of Thieves.
It’s the movie’s biggest drawback – and it’s biggest strength.