Prince of Egypt Movie Review – Passover Style
Posted by Jamie Insalaco
As we’re in the midst of Passover, I thought now would be an appropriate time to take a look back at 1998’s The Prince of Egypt.
NOTE: I’M NOT BOTHERING TO PUT UP THE SPOILER ALERT NOTICE FOR THIS MOVIE… IT’S OVER 10 YEARS OLD AND IT’S ADAPTED FROM THE BOOK OF EXODUS, SO ODDS ARE, YOU’RE PROBABLY ALREADY FAMILIAR WITH THIS STORY.
Before I get to into The Prince of Egypt, I think I should disclose that I’m not much of a fan when it comes to musicals. You know what I find so weird about musicals? People spontaneously burst into song and choreographed dance, that’s what. Besides that, it feels like all musicals are adopted from original source material and the story suffers for it. Perhaps the most seamless transition from book to movie musical is The Wizard of Oz, but the movie still leaves a lot of the book on the cutting room floor. However, if you were a movie producer way back when and somebody handed you this fantastical book and wanted to make a movie about it, you’d be right to do it. There is plenty of wackiness in Oz already, why not ad some singing and dancing? It’s already weird as it is, and making it weirder isn’t going to be much of a problem – anyway, that’s what the guy in the talking lion costume said. I still remember the first time I saw a poster for the Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde musical – having read the book, I was shocked. “What could they possibly find to sing about?” I wondered. I imagined a moment where he broke the forth wall and explained to the audience what it was like to go back and forth between being Jekyll and Hyde in a rousing number I called, “Duel of the Fates” – what? There’s already a tune by that name in Star Wars? Oh well. Let’s just set the words to that tune: “First I’m Jekyll, a kindly doctor; Then I’m Hyde, a hideous monster! Korah! Matah! Korah! Rahtahmah!”
In my mind, singing about Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde doesn’t work, so you can imagine how I feel about turning elements from The Bible/Torah into musicals (take that, Andrew Lloyd Weber) – but really, why sing at all? Does anything do more to take away the seriousness of a subject then adding song and dance? If you’re working on the premise of ‘slavery is bullshit,’ do you really want some asshole to start dancing around, singing some ridiculous song about it?
I just don’t get it. Who’s bright idea was it to adapt The Book of Exodus into a musical?
The idea for the film came about at the formation of DreamWorks, when the three partners, Steven Spielberg, Jeffrey Katzenberg and David Geffen, were meeting in Spielberg’s living room.
I thought then and I still believe now that the decision to do an animated musical version of the Exodus story is because they were thinking that there was no other way to get the audience to take it seriously. And you know what the worst part is? It’s actually a pretty entertaining movie.
Despite the fact that the movie is a musical and adopts its story from a book of The Bible/The Torah (…uhm… I guess you get to pick depending on your religion… and if you’re neither Jewish nor Christian, I guess you can just say it’s based on Judeo -Christian lore), it’s a pretty good piece of film making. Aside from the aforementioned “Playing With The Big Boys,” the songs are decent, and “All I Ever Wanted,” is very well done, both musically and visually. In fact, they really directed their ass off – and when I say ‘they,’ I do mean they: Brenda Chapman, Steve Hickner and Simon Wells are all credited with directing the movie on IMDB… maybe animated movies always have multiple directors, but I don’t know.
Val Kilmer takes on a double role as both Moses and God – how’s that for a resume? The worst part of the movie is Jeff Goldblum as Aaron, who makes no attempt whatsoever to act and hide his Jeff Goldblumishness – his character’s tone sounds so out of place with everyone else in the film, and it’s hard to blame the directors for this because this movies was made way back when Jeff Goldblum being Jeff Goldblum was a big deal. As an actor, he needed to suck less, but he couldn’t be bothered. Otherwise, the cast does a fine job.
The movie didn’t really win any awards, though – it pretty much got it’s ass kicked by The Iron Giant in the Annie Awards, but rightly so – The Iron Giant is an amazing original film, while The King of Egypt is simply a solid movie, no more, no less. Is it worth seeing? I suppose so – if you want to get your Passover on in animated musical form.
My Rating: 3.5 out of 5
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
- Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
- Click to print (Opens in new window)
About Jamie InsalacoJamie Insalaco is the author of CreativeJamie.com, BomberBanter.com and editor in chief of ComicBookClog.com
Posted on April 19, 2011, in movie review and tagged Andrew Lloyd Weber, bible, book of exodus, Danny Glover as Jethro, David Geffen, Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde musical, dreamworks, exodus, Helen Mirren as Queen Tuy, Jeff Goldblum as Aaron, Jeffrey Katzenberg, Martin Short as Huy, Michelle Pfeiffer as Tzipporah, My Rating: 3 out of 5, old testament, passover, Patrick Stewart as Pharaoh Seti I ("Engage!"), prince of egypt, Ralph Fiennes as Rameses II, Sandra Bullock as Miriam, spoiler alert, star wars duel of the fates, Steve Martin as Hotep, Steven Spielberg, the bible, the bible old testament, the torah, torah, wikipedia. Bookmark the permalink. 1 Comment.
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.