Given that many countries in Europe and around the world are memorializing World War I on it’s 100th anniversary, maybe it’s fair for me to suggest that the New York Times tone down that headline. I read the article; one guy said he thought this would be good for their economy – that’s it. He didn’t say anything to the tune of "This is proof of Germany’s superiority; it’s the start of a World Cup victory onslaught that will last a thousand years!"
Anyway, relax is all I’m saying.
I love the New York Times. There are points during the day when I’m sitting at my desk and I think, “Hm… I wonder if the world outside my office is still where I left it or if everything I’ve ever loved and known is on fire right now! Better check…” and I go to nytimes.com and read about the news of the day. Now it’s not unusual to see something I don’t understand as I’m not that smart, but… what is happening here? Read the rest of this entry
Let me start off by declaring my love and undying loyalty to the New York Times. Their website, nytimes.com, is friggin awesome in every sense of the word and is recognized for it’s quality content (Google Page Rank of 9) and world wide popularity (Alexa rank of 88 out of a bizillion websites) by everyone in the online industry and beyond.
But every once and a while, something crazy slips through the cracks. Observe:
The video segment, Times Cast, is sort of like a local network news show, but they only have a few minutes to disperse information. And like a local network news show, They cover important issues of the day and also touch upon the lighter side of the day’s events. Now this format works well enough over an hour or even a half hour, when you only have seven minutes and you choose two serious items and one more that frankly begs an explanation, the latter sticks out like a sore thumb.
So take the quiz! Which one of these news items isn’t like the other? And by ‘other,’ I mean which news item isn’t important to you or anybody else in any conceivable way possible.
From The New York Times:
Huh. Captain America in the house. Let’s take a closer look…
- A goatee? Are you serious? Maybe it’s Boston Red Sox first baseman Kevin Youkilis under the cowl of the Star Spangled Avenger. Or some other loser, whatever.
- The caption reads, “A crowd member dressed as Captain America joined the celebration at the World Trade Center site in New York early Monday morning.” I don’t think carrying a shield, wearing a mask and a t-shirt with Cap’s picture on it necessarily expresses the sentiment of dressing up like someone anymore than those cheap smock Halloween costumes from the 80s did. And those masks that fastened to your head with a rubber band hurt like hell – especially when the rubber band inevitably snapped.
- As a life long reader of Captain America comic books (yes, I’m a dork; I have every issue ever published of Captain America dating back to April of 1968), I can assure you that the following actions that would never be taken by the fictional character, Steve Rogers:
- attending a rally of any kind in costume, unless he was doing crowd control or trying to reason with a group that appeared to gravitating toward violence
- attending a rally that celebrated someone’s death, even an enemy’s
- killing the bad guy; Rogers’ concept of justice has been clearly spelled out over the last 45 or so years – Cap arrests the bad guys so they can stand trial – it’s how he rolls (if anyone retorts with Captain America #321, Volume 1, you’ve a bigger dork than I am – and if you bring up Ultimate Captain America… well, we can have a futile argument about that in the comments sections)
The death of Osama Bin Laden has been something I have not wanted to comment on in this space, but once the New York Times brought Cap into it (or once the goatee guy did), I guess it sorta forced my hand. Cap is a fictional character, and a rare one – unlike any other super hero I can think of, he was created to confront actual people and real events – it’s no accident that the first issue of the original Captain America Comics series from World War II features an image of Cap punching Hitler in the face. Yet he’s not real, and to start waving the shield around at an event like this seems wrong, and to publish a photo of someone doing it feels cheap. Captain America has come to stand for something very specific – he’s the moral compass of the Marvel Universe, not a hit man.
Nevertheless, I strongly support President Obama’s decision in this matter. Just because I don’t want to wave the flag around doesn’t mean I don’t think this was the right thing to do. (It’s also one of those rare moments where a president came through on a campaign promise.) Trying Bin Laden would have been a cluster-@!#?@!, and if you wanted to make the argument that Bin Laden didn’t deserve a trial, I don’t agree, but I’m not willing to argue the point.
Captain America is a symbol for everything that is right about the American way – truth and justice for all, no matter what. Things don’t always work out that way, and the probably shouldn’t – that’s reality. Cap is fiction – so do me a favor and leave him in the funny papers where he belongs.
In case the title of this post is not clear, or if it put you in some sort of pop culture shock, I’ll reiterate: Billie Joe Armstrong of Green Day is going to appear in the American Idiot musical adaptation of the album of the same name. To comment on this, I feel that I should explain my feelings on Green Day, musicals, and the Green Day musical.
Let’s travel way back to the early nineties: the song was “Basket Case,” and I heard it on MTV, because kids, believe it or not, they used to actually play music on MTV. I know that’s a crazy revelation and your head is already spinning, but stay with me now, because here’s another one: Green Day used to be punk. Now I want to be clear that I’m not referring to “Dookie,” the Green Day album that blasted them into the consciousness of American teens everywhere, because by definition, one cannot be punk with an album on a major record label – it fact, it goes against everything the counter-culture punk movement stands for, and Green Day’s original fan base largely abandoned them for leaving Lookout Records – not that it mattered, because teens like myself and millions more were there to pick up “Dookie” (damn Green Day for making me write ‘pick up dookie’), because it’s a fantastic album. I don’t think folks will study it until the end of time, but it’s a great little pop album filled with tons of power-cord fueled three minute energize-you-before-the-big-game songs that I would still listen to today if I was not totally burned out on every single one of them. But yes, before this, Green Day was a fairly legitimate punk band, although Armstrong was often criticized for singing with a fake British accent. (Does he? Growing up a Beatles fan and having a very specific standard for a British accent, I’ve never been able to detect this, but whatever.) Their first two albums, “1039 Smoothed Out Slappy Hours” and “Kerplunk” are solid punk albums – I particularly like “Christie Road” and the gritty guitar sounds found throughout “Kerplunk.”
This, however, does not make me a punk by any extent, not then, not now. I grew up in the Jersey suburbs of Manhattan, went to the movies or the mall with friends and was nearly always driven to these places by a parent. I skateboarded, but I also played hockey on roller blades – during which, I removed my chain-wallet. (My dad used to insist someone was going to use the chain as means to steal my wallet; I should have reminded him I was 13 – what was someone going to steal, my student ID?) I bring all this up because I want to illustrate that I know what punk is, even if I never was one – this is how I know I wasn’t punk in the first place. Besides, I’ve always been a Pearl Jam kind of guy.
So I heard “Dookie,” loved it, got their first two albums, loved those, and eagerly waited for their fourth installment… and what we got was “Insomniac,” which I think event he most hardcore Green Day fan hast to admit is a pretty lame album. There was just nowhere left to go – punk, like the blues, has only so many rooms, and you really have to know what you’re doing to keep redecorating year after year, and frankly, Green Day didn’t know how to do that, and never really figured it out.
Finally, I learned of the abomination that’s currently polluting Broadway. Now I know it’s not fair of me to criticize a show I’ve never seen, but let’s be real: do I really need to see 30 people on stage, head banging and singing in unison (OK, they don’t always sing in unison, but they do always scare me!) to know it’s a pile of flaming crap? I think not. Besides, I’ve listened to the the albums the show is based on; what else do I need to know? And speaking of not fair, I’d say it’s unfair to refer to “American Idiot” as “the Tony Award winning show that everyone is talking about” when the show only won awards for sets and lighting – of which I saw pictures, and yes, they are awesome – especially the lighting. I know that’s what I’m looking for when I go to the theater – excellent sets and lighting, and I go home happy, all be $150 lighter.
From the New York TImes:
With “American Idiot” selling unevenly at the box office after six months of performances, and still a ways off from possibly turning a profit, Mr. Armstrong is making his Broadway debut on Tuesday night in the supporting role of St. Jimmy, a punk rocker with an evil streak that Green Day first created in lyrics from its 2004 album, “American Idiot.” Mr. Armstrong will appear for eight performances ending Sunday evening, suddenly turning the show into a hot ticket.
Jamie: as in billie joe armstrong
(then the ramifications of this clarification hit her.)
nothing more punk than appearing in your own broadway musical …
From the NY Times:
Rock musicians have crossed over to Broadway for years to create or promote shows featuring their music, like Pete Townshend with “The Who’s Tommy” and U2’s Bono and the Edge with the upcoming “Spider-Man” musical. Kevin Cronin, the front man of REO Speedwagon, planned to perform the band’s hit “Can’t Fight This Feeling” on Monday night at the Broadway production of “Rock of Ages.”
PATRICK HEALY thought it was OK to mention “Tommy” in the company of “Spider-Man” and “Rock of Ages.” I haven’t seen “Rock of Ages” and no one has seen “Spider-Man” yet, but what the hell… But you know what? Unless Bono or The Edge (ugh, I still can’t believe that guy calls himself The Edge – what is it with people from Europe? “From now on, everyone should call me Sting.” Right on, Gordon.) plays Spider-Man themselves, I don’t want to hear another thing about it – unless The Green Goblin kills Gwen Stacey in the second act (oh wait, it’s a musical – so the end of the first act before intermission) and Spider-Man sings about how sad he is and how he’s going to kill the Green Goblin; then I’m going.
So Mr. Armstrong isn’t doing anything unprecedented by appearing in his own show, but again, wow. He’s already done everything else he could to get attention for the show: members of the cast performed with Green Day at the Grammy Awards in January and on Monday Night Football’s opening night (when the Jets lost to the Ravens) and the band played with the cast at the Tony Awards in June. What else is left besides Mr. Armstrong joining the cast?
Seth MacFarlane was quoted in a July 20th NYTimes.com article:
“People in America, they’re getting dumber,” Mr. MacFarlane said. “They’re getting less and less able to analyze something and think critically, and pick apart the underlying elements. And more and more ready to make a snap judgment regarding something at face value, which is too bad.”
They way I see it, Mr. MacFarlane should thank his lucky stars – its the reason his shows are still on the air.
I do want to be clear that I think Mr. MacFarlane is correct, but doesn’t it seem a bit hypocritical for the man who brought us Family Guy, American Dad and the Cleveland Show to be criticizing our intelligence? He’s the one making us dumber!
When Family Guy came back (the second time) from cancellation in 2004, their blend of copying parts of old Simpsons episodes with original episodes was abandoned for a far simpler formula of shock value mixed with lengthy illusions (to Wrath of Khan?) and beating gags into the ground (like the return of the Giant Chicken), I feel that the show has outlived it’s entertainment value… or they could just fire all of their writers and start over.
I know Brian is the smart, cultured character, but he’s flawed; this makes him complex, which is good, but also makes it impossible for him to deliver messages and have them taken seriously the way Lisa does on The Simpsons. Just imagine for a second what it would be like if Lisa was an alcoholic.
It seems contrary to me to push three different shows, one of which barely includes any linear story telling, and then tell the audience they’re dumb. The strange thing is, if you see Mr. MacFarlane in an interview of any length, particularly if he’s not pushing anything, he’s articulate, witty, perhaps even brilliant. Too bad his products don’t reflect the man.