About these ads

Republican Governors Association Using Scott Walker’s Union Busting To Raise Money

The Republican Governors Association is running this ad:

republican-governors-association-scott-walker-ad

If you clicked on this ad (well, you cannot click on this ad on this site, but I saw it on YouTube – there is a corresponding commercial, too), it takes you to a page where you can donate money to the RGA.

Before I say anything about the situation in Wisconsin, I have a question about the format of this ad:  why are the words ‘the,’ ‘as’ and ‘we’ italicized?  Why is ‘Scott Walker’ in a different font than ‘Support’ and ‘defend,’ and maybe the rest of the ad?  I would also argue against using the word ‘defend’ in an ad – although not from a legal standpoint, the word ‘defend’ tends to imply that somebody did something wrong, and that’s not the sort of message I would want to convey in my ad.  If anybody wants a quick lesson in photoshop (or the basic logic that is employed when creating an ad) , I’m happy to oblige.

I just don’t understand why Governor Walker wants to take away the union’s rights to collectively bargain.  In my view, that pretty much dissolves the union, and just because you’re wearing a suit and not brandishing a baseball bat doesn’t make you any better than your union busting predecessors.  I’ve heard the argument that unions have outlived their usefulness, but I tend to disagree – of course, the people I’ve heard make that argument are rich people who don’t need a union’s protection.

It’s a matter of record that the Republican National Committee has over $20 million dollars of debt, and I don’t know if that figure includes any debt owed by the RGA or if this ad is how they’re trying to raise money, but I certainly hope not.  I don’t understand how Republicans (in general, not specifically Gov. Walker) can make the argument that they favor fiscal responsibility when the most recent Republican president outspent every other administration in history (including President Reagan, and that’s impressive) and their National Committee spent over $20 million they didn’t have on election expenses.  $20 million dollars is a lot; it’s like they over spent by $20 bucks or $20,000. – and that’s what taking away collective bargaining is all about, right?  Saving money?  Or at least, that’s the argument I’ve been hearing, but not understanding.

It’s OK to ask people to donate money to your cause, but when it’s busting a union, that’s a tough sell, not to mention that it feels inappropriate in a, “we-need-money-to-keep-from-paying-people-a-negotiated-wage” sort of way.  Depriving people of the right to assemble and reason out their differences seems to go against the American way – isn’t that what we’re all about?

I welcome debate on this!  Drop some comments!

About these ads

About Jamie Insalaco

Jamie Insalaco is the author of CreativeJamie.com and BomberBanter.com

Posted on March 5, 2011, in observations and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 4 Comments.

  1. So pretty much the Republicans who want to fix our economy are broke…that sure makes me feel better.

    • Well, I’m sure that not only is the RNC broke, they’re in massive debt – as for the RGA, well, I don’t know what their financial status is – they might not be broke, they might be just as opportunistic as Gov Walker! (That’s not to say the Gov Walker is the first politician to take advantage of circumstances to push his agenda – they pretty much all do that – but I think it’s fair to say that while he isn’t the first to go to far, he certainly is the most recent!)

      Essentially what I’ve gotten from the 2010 – 2011 Republicans is that bonuses for AIG are OK because they’re contractually obligated but paying teachers $50k a year PLUS benefits? They seem to think that’s crazy talk. I don’t think the American people are going along with them on this one, but we’ll see.

  2. Yeah, that really bothers me about AIG and other similar companies. I saw some news articles on that topic. I think that there is going to be a shortage of teachers in about 10 years because of all this. Most of the older teachers are retiring as quickly as possible and any incoming teachers are being discouraged to join the field.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 418 other followers

%d bloggers like this: